Joined: |
Dec 22, 2013 10:01 PM |
Last Post: |
Jan 8, 2014 11:55 AM |
Last Visit: |
Jan 8, 2014 12:27 PM |
Website: |
|
Location: |
|
Interests: |
|
Favorite Bands: |
|
Favorite Modes: |
|
|
Send Private Message
|
S59DM Dejan Matvoz has contributed to 2 posts out of 11671 total posts
(0.02%) in 3,840 days (0.00 posts per day).
20 Most recent posts:
Hi, Dave and thanks for your answer!
73! Dejan
S59DM Dejan Matvoz
Hello!
I'm new to the eQSL and have looked for this topic in your help files but could not find the definite answer so I'm asking the question here. ![](images/icon_smile_blush.gif)
I like the eQSL system but I guess I have a tiny problem using it properly. I have uploaded a few QSO infos for the stations, which worked portable (with the "/P") after their callsign. Because their callsign was with the /P, I entered them with the /P in my LOG file (Swisslog). And the ADIF file created also made the "call/P" record for the callsign. Then I uploaded this file to the eQSL with no errors.
After that I received the eQSL card from one of those "/P" correspondents (which had no /P after his callsign) and had to confirm it manually, but as displayed in my outbox, the correspondent did not receive my eQSL card sent with the "call/P".
Now in my outbox I have a double record for the same QSO with the same data. Once with the /P, which was not seen by the correspondent and I have a "notify" displayed besides his callsign but the "notify" link informs, that the user was not found. And the other same QSO is the one without the "/P" which is displayed with the same QSO data. I believe now that my correspondent actually did not receive my eQSL card because it was adressed to the call/P!
How do I resolve this problem?
Should I manually correct all the /P, /MM, XX/call in my LOGBOOK to the calls without them? Is that legal? I don't think so. Should the correspondent create his "new QTH account" with the "call/P" and then he will receive the eQSL card?
Thanks for the answer! 73 & GL! Dejan
S59DM Dejan Matvoz
|
|