 |
|
eQSL.cc Home
Search
Login
Authors
Recent Posts| Viewing User Profile for: IK5PVX Pierfrancesco Caci | |||||||||||||||||||
| About | Contact | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Send Private Message |
||||||||||||||||||
| Post Statistics | |||||||||||||||||||
|
IK5PVX Pierfrancesco Caci has contributed to 1 posts out of 11671 total posts
(0.01%) in 5,912 days (0.00 posts per day).
20 Most recent posts:
Getting more eQSLs »
Why (some) hams don't use eQSL Sep 6, 2008 09:06 AM
(Total replies: 10)
Quote: - I use LOTW Fair commentary. I only use eQSL because I don't want to be bothered uploading to two spots (and I think the pretend "security" of LotW is wholly unnecessary for the hobby). If you're using LOTW already, why switch? I can understand that. This is a major hurdle for eQSL to overcome, and I don't have any ideas how to approach it, and it relates directly to "eQSL not accepted" this is something that really I don't understand. You have the logging program, you've bothered to export your monthly log (or whatever) to ADIF. How long does it take to upload it to eqsl? less then one minute. then another minute to sign it with tqsl, and another bunch of seconds to upload it to lotw. There, you've made both worlds happy. ("you" being the generic ham here, not the original poster, I'm not blaming anyone in particular) another thing that I don't understand are those that put "please no eqsl" in their macros (besides the fact that they are not capable of doing a qso without the macros). You're not on eqsl? ok. My confirmation will be there waiting for you in case you change your mind. Pf IK5PVX Pierfrancesco Caci |
|||||||||||||||||||