eQSL.cc Forum
Help!  eQSL.cc Home  Forums Home  Search  Login 
»Forums Index »General Interest Support »Authenticity Guaranteed »SUGGESTION for Eqsl
Author Topic: SUGGESTION for Eqsl (2 messages, Page 1 of 1)

VK5PO John F. McRae
Posts: 1
Joined: Feb 14, 2003



Posted: Jan 28, 2013 12:10 AM          Msg. 1 of 2
I really think eQSL.cc need to display something like this text in bold letters:

Please CROSS CHECK thoroughly all QSO's, to ensure that you
DO NOT falsely claim an eQSL, by either not checking properly, or willful actions!!!!

FALSE CLAIMS WILL NOT BE TOLERATED.



I mention this as I can PROVE that this kind of behavior has taken place.

NO one likes a CHEAT.

Please consider this request, as I feel it is imperative to HOLD and MAINTAIN total credibility with the eQSL system.
73 guys, And thank You.
John McRae, VK5PO

VK5PO John F. McRae

N1ORK Orest Andy Zajac
Posts: 942
Joined: Sep 7, 2006

QRZ..QRZ..Any one out there?..Is this thing on??



Posted: Jan 28, 2013 01:14 PM          Msg. 2 of 2
John,
If you are referring to the Confirm or Reject buttons in the InBox, I agree that one should be honest in what one does. Make sure you have the QSO in your log before you confirm a QSO. If not, reject it and provide why you rejected the QSO. Many times I have gotten an eQSL for my main call that should have been for my /P call. I reject that eQSL and ask the Ham to re-submit the eQSL to my n1ork/p account. Many times I later see the eQSL in the correct account. If I get an eQSL from a SWLer, I first verify that the SWLer has given the correct calls, times and band before I confirm the SWL report.
I agree that something should be added as a CAUTION to the InBox display to remind Hams to verify first, then either confirm or reject the eQSL.
73

N1ORK Orest 'Andy' Zajac