Joined: |
Aug 17, 2007 04:06 AM |
Last Post: |
Oct 23, 2020 09:28 PM |
Last Visit: |
Sep 15, 2022 08:47 PM |
Website: |
|
Location: |
|
Interests: |
|
|
Send Private Message
|
WA2HIP John R. Petrocelli has contributed to 3 posts out of 11719 total posts
(0.03%) in 6,253 days (0.00 posts per day).
20 Most recent posts:
I realize this although FT4 was added in the past.
I was merely offering that the others (Clublog, LOTW, & QRZ) do accept FST4 as a mode. FST4 does work, as I if it is entered as a SUBMODE of MFSK.
Thanks for your reply !
WA2HIP John R. Petrocelli
RE: FST4 to Online Logs.
A) Created a dummy QSO ADIF record with "<MODE:4>FST4" ...AND... was accepted by LOTW, QRZ & ClubLog, BUT WAS REJECTED by eQSL !
B) Then I created another QSO ADIF record with "<MODE;4>MFSK<SUBMODE:4>FST4" and WAS ACCEPTED by ALL 4 !!!
WA2HIP John R. Petrocelli
May I suggest that it would be very helpful if there was a eQSL_Received_Date field.
This would help when on is trying to determine if there is a need to review ALL vs. a subset of eQSL's received for verification against one's log.
Thanks for being here. 73 John - WA2HIP
WA2HIP John R. Petrocelli
|
|